(1) Appointed on 2 April 2007.
Board performance evaluation
Each year the Board undertakes a formal evaluation of its own
performance and that of its Committees and individual directors
either internally, by the Senior Independent Director, or by
external consultants. This year, in order to maintain objectivity
and to ensure “best practice” following three years of internal
Board review; the performance evaluation was undertaken externally
by Dr Tracy Long of Boardroom Review based on all the directors,
including the Chairman, completing a comprehensive questionnaire
and then having one-to-one interviews with Dr Long. The process
covered Board, Committee and personal performance and the output
was reviewed at the March Board meeting as part of a wider
corporate governance review. Overall, it was concluded that the
Board and its Committees continued to operate effectively with
appropriate procedures put in place form in or areas identified for
improvement.
Committees of the Board
The Board has Nomination, Remuneration and Audit Committees which
deal with specific aspects of the Group’s affairs, each of which
has written terms of reference which are regularly reviewed and
which deal with their authorities and duties.
Nomination Committee
The Nomination Committee comprises Kathleen O’Donovan (Chairman),
Phillip Rose and Richard Peskin. It undertakes an annual review of
succession planning for Senior Executives and ensures that the
membership and composition of the Board, including the balance of
the skills, continue to be appropriate. In making recommendations
to the Board of Non-Executive Directors, it specifically considers
the expected time commitment of the proposed Non-Executive and
other commitments they already have. Agreement of the Chairman of
the Company is also required before a Non-Executive Director may
accept any additional commitments which could affect the time
available to devote to the Company.
Non-Executive Directors are not appointed for specified terms but
are subject to re-election by the shareholders at least every three
years.Under the current Articles of Association at least a third of
the Board, not including directors appointed during the year, must
retire by rotation fromthe Board each year and all proposed
reappointments to the Board are formally considered by the
Nomination Committee in March.Under the proposed new Articles of
Association, a director will retire from office at the third annual
general meeting following the annual general meeting at which he
was appointed or last reappointed.
As outlined in the Chairman’s statement, it is intended that
Richard Peskin,who has been Non-Executive Chairman since March
2000,will retire on 16 March 2009 and recruitment of a new Chairman
has begun using external consultants Whitehead Mann.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee, which comprises Charles Irby
(Chairman), Jonathan Short and Kathleen O’Donovan, has
responsibility for determining the remuneration, bonuses, contract
terms and other benefits in respect of the Executive Directors, and
the remuneration of the Chairman. It also considers and establishes
Company policy on remuneration,with access to professional advice
outside the Company, as required.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee comprises Kathleen O’Donovan (Chairman),
Charles Irby, Phillip Rose and Jonathan Short (who was appointed to
the Committee on 22 January 2008). Miss O’Donovan is also Chairman
of the Audit Committee of Prudential plc and Trinity Mirror plc and
a member of the Audit Committee of Arm Holdings plc. The Audit
Committee provides a forum for reporting by the Group’s external
auditors and meetings are also attended by certain Senior
Executives, by invitation. During the year, the Committee was
responsible for reviewing, and reporting to the Board on, a range
of matters including:
- the interim management statements, the half year and annual
financial statements and significant reporting judgements
therein;
- meetings with the Company auditors and property valuers;
- developments in accounting and reporting requirements;
- the review of the Company’s internal control and risk
management systems;
- the scope, effectiveness independence and objectivity of the
external audit;
- the external auditors' management letter;
- the level of fees paid to the external auditors;
- the potential need for an internal audit function; and
- the Company’s whistleblowing policy
The Audit Committee advises the Board on the appointment of the
external auditors, their remuneration for audit and non-audit work,
and their cost effectiveness, independence and objectivity, and
discusses the nature, scope and results of the audit with the
external auditors.As part of the review of the effectiveness of the
auditors, a formal evaluation process incorporating feedback from
the Audit Committee and relevant members of management is provided
to the auditors.
The auditors are responsible for the annual audit and other
services which the Audit Committee believe they are best placed to
undertake due to their position as auditors.During the year these
included compliance reporting for transactions, debentures, bonus
plans and the long-term incentive plans
Deloitte and Touche LLP have confirmed to the Audit Committee that
they remain independent and have maintained internal safeguards to
ensure their objectivity.
Due to its size and structure, the Group does not have an internal
audit function, a matter which is kept under review by the
Committee. Although there is no formal internal audit function, a
rolling programme of review of key controls is conducted through a
combination of the external audit process or through reviews by
members of the finance team and/or external advisers as
appropriate.
Internal controls
The Board recognises that it is responsible for the Group’s system
of internal control and for reviewing its effectiveness, at least
annually. Such a system can only provide reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance against material misstatement or loss, as it is
designed to manage rather than eliminate the risk of failure to
achieve business objectives.
There are ongoing processes and procedures for identifying,
evaluating and managing the principal risks faced by the Group;
these processes and procedures were in place throughout the year
under review and up to the date of the approval of the Annual
Report, and accord with the Turnbull guidance “Internal Control –
Guidance for Directors on the Combined Code”.
Key features of the system of internal control include:
- a comprehensive system of financial reporting and business
planning;
- a defined schedule of matters for decision by the Board;
- an organisational structure with clearly defined levels of
authority and division of responsibilities;
- formal documentation procedures;
- the close involvement of the Executive Directors in all aspects
of day-to-day operations, including regular meetings with senior
management to review all operational aspects of the business and
risk management systems; and
- The Board reviewing Group strategy and progress on developments
at each scheduled Board meeting.
The Audit Committee carries out a twice yearly review of the
framework of how the Group’s risks are managed through operational
management procedures/authorisations, ongoing review by the
Executive Committee, and Board review and oversight, formally
considering the scope and effectiveness of the Group’s system of
internal control and reporting to the Board. This involves the
identification of risks specific to the areas of property and
financial markets which impact on the Group’s objectives, together
with the controls and reporting procedures designed to minimise
those risks, which are reviewed, formalised and updated throughout
the year, as appropriate. These include business risks, financial
controls, social, ethical and environmental issues and policy, and
the regulatory environment. Key risks to the business and the
processes in place by which the Company aims to manage those
risks.
Relations with shareholders
Communications with shareholders is given a high priority and the
Company undertakes a regular dialogue with shareholders and fund
managers.Visits are also arranged to buildings of particular
interest or significance, particularly in relation to developments,
to assist investors’ understanding of the Company’s business. The
Executive Directors are the Company’s principal spokesmen with
investors, analysts, fund managers, press and other interested
parties, and independent feedback on presentations by the Executive
Directors to all major shareholders is provided to the
Non-Executive Directors on a regular basis. Presentations to
analysts and the accompanying script are simultaneously posted on
the Company’s website. As Chairman and Senior Independent Director,
respectively, Richard Peskin and Kathleen O’Donovan are each
available, as appropriate, as a contact for shareholders.
The Annual General Meeting provides the Board with an opportunity
to communicate with, and answer questions from, private and
institutional shareholders and the whole Board is available before
the meeting, in particular, for shareholders to meet new directors.
The Chairman of each of the Audit, Nomination and Remuneration
Committees is available at the Annual General Meeting to answer
questions. Details of the resolutions to be proposed at the Annual
General Meeting on 3 July 2008 can be found in the Notice of
Meeting. Details of the number of proxy votes for, against and
withheld for each resolution, will be disclosed at the meeting and
posted online.
Going concern
After making due enquiries, the directors have a reasonable
expectation that the Group has adequate resources to continue in
operational existence for the foreseeable future. For this reason,
they continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the
financial statements.